“Resilience” and the recent manufactured events

I think many of us could sense that there was something very unsettling about both Sandy Hook and Boston – the happy, smiling families.  Why?  How?  We know it is so very inappropriate to put on a happy face in the wake of the most traumatic thing one could ever imagine … the loss of a child or surviving a life threatening and devastating limb loss.  The response wasn’t natural and it bothered me and I wanted to understand it.  Many chalked it up to bad acting and their inability to show realistic signs of grief, but now that I’ve had a chance to research things about Sandy Hook and now Boston, I think I’m beginning to understand what we’re seeing.

If you haven’t noticed, the term Resilience is being thrown around constantly in reference to these events.

And Boston:

The first time I heard the term was during the Sandy Hook interviews and Dr. Woodall talked about the resilience of the town of Sandy Hook.  I discovered that he was involved in the Unity Project – resilience of kids after trauma and had also worked for USAid in Uganda and had implemented the programs there.

DHS has resilience programs and the IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross) presented a Resilience program to the United Nations last fall.  There is a very strong push so we really need to try to understand all of this.

If you search, you will find tons of resilience programs in every aspect of our lives – from schools to work to disasters and on and on.  I believe that most of this ties into Agenda 21 because it’s about green living, sustainability and security.  We really need to pay close attention to these programs because this will not be good for America.

I noticed that DHS recently initiated a Resilience pilot program at a handful of select universities.  Drexel is one of them.  I watched a short video that provided an overview of the program at Drexel and the goal is to identify shortfalls in the current security system so that they can recommend improvements that will soon be implemented in all universities and grade schools across the country.

And more details about the program -

Drexel University will work with the Department of Homeland Security to improve safety on campus. Secretary Janet Napolitano announced the partnership Tuesday, along with university President John Fry.

DHS has enlisted just seven schools to participate.

“All campuses around the country need to be prepared and have thought through ahead of time what to do if,” Naplitano said. “What to do if there is an active shooter? What to do if you have a shooter and a hazardous substance at the same time?”

The training would also help the campus deal with natural disasters and prolonged power outages.

The partnership will include training campus security and local law enforcement officers to respond to emergencies such as a shooting.

Universities applied to be included in this program, they wanted this.  The goal is to make the schools more resilient, better able to withstand a disaster or shooting.  How will they achieve this?  By doing live-shooter drills and other emergency drills and then putting together strategies to improve the school’s security systems.  People embrace it because they believe it is necessary and it will make them feel safe, but my fear is that we’re going to go too far and once the changes are made, they will never go back to freedom.  We will be living in a complete police state.  We already have to deal with unreasonable, unconstitutional searches and invasive pat-downs at airports.  We can’t let them make all of our schools like airports and then next it will be everywhere.  It is completely out of control.

Back to Sandy Hook and Boston.  As I mentioned above, we all saw unnatural responses to the trauma there.  I think that this was deliberate …. that it was not “bad acting” but it was a display of resilience.  Sandy Hook had all of the training.  They did DHS HSEEP training.  They had a special EOC (Emergency Operation Center) that cost close to $500,000 partially federally funded.  Connecticut signed onto Project Longevity just weeks before the alleged shootings.  So they had all of the programs.  I think that whomever orchestrated the Sandy Hook event did so to show the world that these training programs and drills worked.  “See?  Everyone is resilient!  Families are able to bounce back after this tragedy because we were prepared“.

It took me a while to understand this.  It was so puzzling to see people respond to a tragedy this way but now that I understand the enormous focus on resilience throughout the world, I believe this was an example for all the world to see.   And the result of the Sandy Hook shooting is of course increased security in schools, and that in their minds is all part of making the schools and the community more resilient.

Boston had a brand new $225 million rehabilitation center, Spaulding.  It opened a week after the “bombing” and all of the amputees went there for their treatment.  It is a resilient, green, sustainable building, and because they went there for treatment, they have all bounced back amazingly, attending sporting events, planning marathons, Dancing with the Stars engagements and on and on.

Of course it’s impossible to know for sure, but I believe this is why we’re seeing so many happy people.  It’s because the communities were resilient.  There will be much more of this with many different programs in schools, work, and communities.  It is all part of Agenda 21 and they are making it seem like it’s a wonderful thing.  These events were advertisements for these programs.

Observations about the Cleveland kidnapping story

I don’t want to believe that every story out there is fake, and I’m not saying for certain that this one is …. yet, but I wanted to at least summarize some of my initial observations and share them with you.

For starters, I couldn’t help noticing the similarities of this story to the recently released movie The Factory.  I saw the movie fairly recently and when this story broke I immediately recalled the movie because the plot is so similar.  Actor, John Cusack plays a cop investigating several cases of missing women.  His daughter is kidnapped and we see the home of the kidnapper, where the victims are taken.  Together there are three women, one of them is pregnant and it’s the kidnapper’s goal to have them all conceive children.  The movie doesn’t reveal why he wants the children until the end and I won’t go into that but the similarities are striking.   The Factory is supposed to be based on a true story but there isn’t any information out there about the circumstances of the actual events.  This is the movie trailer.

Aside from the very interesting similarities of this story to the movie, there are other things that bother me.  When the story first broke, I searched for information on the girls and I found a website that was set up for Amanda Berry, but the odd thing is that the information on it was incorrect.  It turned out that the information listed is for another missing girl who was featured on the America’s Most Wanted website just below Amanda Berry.  I thought it was very odd that no one ever corrected this in all the years she was missing.

I also thought it was odd that her sister still had “missing” flyers posted outside the home and a fresh yellow ribbon 10 years later.

Both Amanda and Gina had the same “Welcome home” banners.  I thought that was a little strange that someone would have taken the time to coordinate something like that, and to be honest – all of the balloons and hoopla seemed inappropriate to me under the circumstances.  These women were allegedly very severely abused for many years and I would have expected things to be more subdued.

When searching in People Finders, I can find “Ariel Castro” but it simply lists his name and just the one address – 2207 Seymour – no age, no past addresses.  I thought that was odd.  When you search for the daughter, “Angie” ,  she has Ariel listed as a relative but he’s 31 years old.  There is no listing for an older Ariel.  The 31 year old has many addresses, including Fort Wayne, Indiana and Bowling Green, Ohio.

This is all that’s listed for Ariel.  His age isn’t listed and no past addresses are listed, which is very odd.

The daughter (Angie) – The only Ariel related to her is the 31 year old.

The 31 year old Ariel has many addresses listed.  The media reports that he is the son of Ariel the kidnapper and that he goes by the name “Anthony”. There are articles that suggest that he wrote a news article at the time of Gina’s disappearance and there are also reports that he graduated from Bowling Green in 2004 with a journalism degree.  The thing that I find very odd is that in both cases, his name is listed as “Ariel Castro”.  It’s on the article and it’s on the school graduation records.  Why would his proper name be listed on either of those if he truly went by the name Anthony?  This isn’t the driver’s license office.

I used to live in Cleveland and never heard of “The Plain Press”.  The main newspaper is The Plain Dealer.  But even if the paper really does exist, why would he list his name as Ariel Castro instead of Anthony?!

Then there are the photos.  Why is it so rare to see realistic looking photos of the people involved in these things?  Things like this make me question the stories.  It can’t be avoided.

There are two photos of “Ariel” in front of the cellar door with the incriminating lock on it.  One of them is with “Anthony/Ariel junior” and the other is with an unnamed girlfriend.  There are some strange things about the photos but the main thing that stands out is in the girlfriend photo, his leg is quite bent and the object he has his foot on is considerably higher than the photo with Anthony.  This is very odd because it’s obvious these were taken at the same time, so why would someone put a different prop in one of the photos for a foot rest?

There are other odd things about the photos aside from the large footrest in the girlfriend photo.  There is something going on on the lower wall behind Anthony and it’s just so odd that anyone would take photos of them in front of that door.  It’s not a very nice looking background and it seems too contrived.

I wanted to search for more information on the 31 year old Ariel who has lived in Indiana and Bowling Green, Ohio but it’s impossible because the way Google works now, you can’t search for past articles anymore.  If you try to search for anyone by that name and location you will get stories about the Cleveland kidnapping Ariel and they conveniently have stories to address that – there’s an Ariel junior who lived at these locations and wrote articles and graduated under that name but he doesn’t go by that name.  I think it’s very possible that there is no Ariel Castro, age 52.  There should be more history on him and the photos are clearly altered.

The stories emerging about him seem unbelievable too.  Here are a few examples from this USA Today article:

In November 1994, Castro allegedly threatened the owner of a neighboring property with a shovel. Ernesto Santiago told police he went to check on a rental property next to Castro’s on Seymour Avenue because a chain link fence was missing. Castro “became upset … (and) picked up a shovel and attempted to hit victim with same.”

This doesn’t make any sense at all.  He “became upset”, why?

On May 16, 1996, police charged Castro with menacing on May 16, 1996. Fernando Colon, who was then dating Figueroa, said he had taken her children to the school bus stop. Castro, the children’s father, pulled up behind him and got out of his car.

“He told the victim that he had better watch himself,” the report said.

Colon got out of his car and tried to talk to Castro, but Castro drove away. Colon told police he thought Castro “would have ran him over if he did not get out of his way,” the report said. “This is an ongoing problem.”

Not believable.

In August 1996, a police report says Castro drove to a former neighbor’s house, stopped in front of the driveway and screamed out of his car window, “I’m gonna get you, bitch,” then drove off. Police again charged Castro with menacing.

This isn’t either, sorry.

In 2004, police initially charged Castro with child endangerment and abduction after he left a child unattended on his bus.

Castro allegedly picked up the child, a 13-year-old boy, from his home care provider. Castro allegedly escorted another child into school, but left the boy on the bus. When Castro returned to the bus, he drove to Wendy’s restaurant and allegedly told the child to “lay down, bitch” while he went into the Wendy’s to eat.

Castro allegedly returned to the bus, drove around for a while and then dropped the child off at the original pick up point two hours later. Police found no evidence of sexual or other assault and the case was referred to Board of Education police.

Cleveland Schools suspended Castro for 60 days for leaving the special needs child on the bus. A child abuse and neglect investigation found the child neglect charge to be “unsubstantiated.”

Seriously?  This doesn’t make any sense either!  Why would he go to Wendy’s, drive around and then take the kid to the school.  Not buying it.

Aside from that, we have only seen a photo of one of the girls, Amanda.  We haven’t seen a photo or any interviews with the other girls.  Then there are allegations from so called neighbors that describe how they contacted police, but police have no record of any of these calls.

When I do an address search in People Finders, I’m able to see a list of registered sex offenders near the address.  I looked at the names listed near 2207 Seymour and there’s a DeJesus, a Castro and a Knight.  Coincidence?

Another coincidence – the ex-wife’s boyfriend’s name was Fernando Colon.  There’s a cell phone video of Cleveland police breaking into Castro’s home.  The girl who recorded it is Ashley Colon.

I’m just not convinced yet that this story is true.  I hate that I have to be so skeptical of these stories but they just don’t add up.  If it is true, it’s very difficult to believe … if it’s not true, we must consider what the goal is.  I suppose it could be – if there’s an Amber alert, police should be able to search the inside completely of all homes in the area.  They could also be going for RFID chips on all kids.  I just don’t know.

Sandy Hook – Oddities surrounding the fire on Berkshire Road

I don’t know if many are aware of this story, but approximately three months after the reported Sandy Hook school shootings, there was a house fire that destroyed the home and all belongings of Hans and Audra Barth.  They allegedly had kids who attended Sandy Hook Elementary, so of course this news made national headlines…trauma once again for “survivors” of Sandy Hook school.

At the time I remembered thinking that some of the photos looked odd – why would the family pose for a photo in front of their burned up home?

Of course, there were immediate fundraisers set up for the family.

I decided to take a look at some of the property records.  Apparently, the bank foreclosed on them on 8/29/08.

On 9/18/08 Beneficial Mortgage purchased the home for $0, according to the records.  Then less than a year later, on 5/8/09, the Barths take out a new loan in the amount of $273,258; but they re-purchased the home for $195,165.  So they apparently had a net gain of almost $80K.

It appears that the documents weren’t signed until 8/17/11?  Then, in March of this year they lost the home to the fire and I assume the insurance would have covered the loss, although I wasn’t able to find any reports about the investigation into the cause of the fire.

Chief Halstead was in charge of the operation that day to put out the fire, yet oddly there is no call logged for this on their website.  Only one call is recorded for March and this was not it.

The images of the home post-fire are different than the pre-fire images in Bing and Google maps.  The front looks pretty consistent, but I’m not seeing the deck on the back of the house.

Front of Barth home post fire

Image from Bing:

If you look at the rear of the home in Bing, there is NO deck and the house looks like a typical ranch style and it looks different than the burned up home in the photos.  I honestly don’t know what to make of it.

Here it is in Google and it looks like there is some type of decking but it really doesn’t look like the fire photo and it doesn’t look like they’d be able to fit a door in the lower part of the home as depicted in the fire photo.

So I guess we can chalk this up to just another of the many Sandy Hook oddities.  The couple were foreclosed on, yet somehow were able to qualify and then purchase the home again less than one year later.  How can this be?  The had a net gain as the mortgage was less than the borrowed amount … then the fire occurred and they received donations.  We never heard the cause of the fire, no follow up story was ever done.  The pictures look strange, the Sandy Hook fire department didn’t log the call and I can’t help but wonder what really happened there.

The issues surrounding the burial of Tamerlan Tsarnaev

I noticed that the media is spending a great deal of time covering the story about how the funeral director in Worcester can’t find a cemetery that’s willing to bury Tamerlan Tsarnaev.  Like so many other stories associated with the entire Boston bombing “event”, I’m not buying it.  It really doesn’t make much sense and it seems like propaganda.

The first thing I wondered was why?  What are they trying to convey with this story?  I believe they want everyone to believe that the people of Boston are so distraught over the bombings that they are chasing down such things as where the suspect is to be buried.  That someone somehow learned that the Graham, Putnam and Mahoney Funeral Home had Tamerlan’s body and they felt they must stand outside the funeral home with protest signs.  Seriously?  And further, none of the cemeteries will allow him to be buried because they fear public backlash.

Backlash for what?  For burying a man who is a suspected bomber?  He was never tried and convicted but he has been convicted through the media.  To protest a burial doesn’t punish the suspect.  It only causes unnecessary grief to the family who has done nothing to deserve this.  Is that what our society has become?  We’re proud Americans but we’ll treat this family of a suspect this way?  Do you not see how the media is manipulating you into believing that it’s right to protest and interfere with the proper burial of a person that we don’t even know is guilty of anything.

It seems to me that “they” want us to discard the presumption of innocence.  Everyone who seeks to protest this burial should acknowledge that they are willing to throw away the presumption of innocence but should understand that it’s a dangerous line to cross because they never know when they may be accused of something.  If we let this happen, we are nullifying everything our judicial system is based on.  Why would we jeopardize our liberty that way?  Don’t let the media influence you this way.  Think objectively about what they’re doing … pay attention to these stories and really consider if you think they are influencing you in a way that goes against your true feelings about our rights as Americans.

But, let me get back to this story (with a disclaimer).  I don’t believe the brothers existed or bombed anything.  I believe the bombing was faked, that there were no victims and the entire story about the police chase and shootout with the brothers was manufactured.  I believe that these residual stories are also fabricated to support the lies.  Having said that, I feel I must comment on the way the residual stories are playing out because it’s just so wrong.

Why is “Tamerlan” at this funeral home for indigents that no one else will take in when he has a family?  A wife, uncles and parents who believe he was set up.  Why wasn’t a private service simply arranged by the family, similarly to how Adam Lanza’s service was performed?  Because they wanted to make a big deal of this “terrorist” not being buried on American soil.  They have to make it an “us versus them” story … the evil Muslim terrorists.

I didn’t spend a lot of time trying to determine if this funeral home is legitimate but a quick search for funeral homes in Worcester led me to a site that listed several of them.  When I clicked on the one in the article, and then clicked on “visit website”, it goes to “Darkmindedangels(dot)com”.  I wouldn’t recommend visiting the site but I can tell you, it is most certainly not a funeral home website.

I don’t know how this story will play out, but I’m so disturbed by what I’m seeing – from the smiling, happy, fake victims to the crowds cheering the police for arresting a suspect after forcing citizens to remain in lockdown for an entire day – to the way they are making the survivors out to be heroes when they haven’t done anything heroic, to the endless fundraisers to the trial by media.  I’m sick of all of it.

Boston marathon: A huge time discrepancy

Someone posted a comment on my blog this morning (thank you) about the finish times, recommending that I take a look at them.  A runner, #19793 was visible in the video just when the first “bomb” was heard.  I looked him up and found that his recorded time was 4:08:27.  Remember that the time shown on the screen was 4:09:46.  The runner’s name is Fischer Volker,  and here’s an article describing the connection the runners made with each other, since they were all were near the finish line when this allegedly happened.

Timing is everything. It’s how a handful of runners, having started a race that included nearly 27,000 people, ended up in the same place at the same moment, 26.2 miles away and four hours later. As the race clock hits 4:09:44, Mayes can be seen on the right side of Boylston in a fluorescent green shirt. Jenkins, in purple, is a few feet to his side. Volker Fischer, all in black with shades and knee socks, jogs down the center. Clark, her red hair tied in pigtails, is two seconds off their pace. Brian Donovan, wearing a bright orange shirt for his cause, the Grassroot Soccer team, is three seconds behind her, on the Marathon Sports side of Boylston, as the bomb explodes.

Remember that there are also reports that the runners were diverted.  This article states that they were diverted 7 minutes after the explosion, so that would have been time 4:16 or 2:57PM (The “bomb” exploded at 2:50PM).  However, if you look at the runner’s recorded times, there is never an interruption.  The marathon continues and times are steadily recorded until 4:44, which would have been 3:25PM.

I believe this is further evidence that everything we were shown was prepared in advance to include all videos and photos.  In reality, the race continued until 3:25PM when someone finally made the decision to halt it.  Would they seriously have had runners going down Boylston Street past the bomb sites for 35 minutes if this had really happened?  I don’t think so!

Here is how the article reports the runners being diverted.

When the two blasts occurred on Boylston Street, the time stamp read 4 hours 9 minutes on the race clock. Those who crossed the finish line at that moment were some of the last to do so in the 2013 Boston Marathon, as the Boston Athletic Association soon shut down the race in the wake of the explosions at 2:50 p.m. Monday.

Runners were diverted off the race course and onto Commonwealth Avenue, as police and ambulances rushed to the scene. Shortly after, no one was allowed to make the turn onto Hereford Street or the turn onto Boylston Street. They instead, continued straight, without any understanding of why they were not following the traditional course.

“I’ll never forget that one, that’s for sure. It was a nightmare,” said Mike Beeman, 56, of Tifton, Ga. He estimated he was less than .2 miles from the blasts, having made the turn onto Boylston.

Of the 23,326 runners who started the Marathon, 17,584 finished before the race was stopped. There were 4,496 runners who made it to the 40-kilometer mark — where runners enter Boston — but did not cross the finish line, with the last recorded finisher at approximately 2:57 p.m. That meant 1,246 runners never made it to the 40K mark, either dropping out or being stopped from continuing.

How is it possible to account for this huge time discrepancy?  A 28 minute discrepancy from the actual recorded times of the runners?

_____________________________________________________________

Edited to add:  I want to be perfectly clear.  What this means is that authorities never closed off Boylston Street after the first “bomb” until a full 35 minutes later.  How did they know there wasn’t still danger, more bombs?  Would they really have put all those runners at risk for 35 additional minutes?  Apparently, based on the recorded times – they did just that.

My sadness about the Boston “bombing”

I’ve been wanting to cover more about the Boston “bombing” but there’s so much that I’m not really sure where to begin.  It’s difficult because I really want others to see this for what it is – a completely fabricated story designed to gain more control over the American people.  If you doubt that, just take a step back and think about what they will (and already have) gained from this “event”.   The people of Boston, “Boston Strong” as they are referred to,  have embraced and applauded martial law.  It is difficult for me to describe the sick feeling I had after seeing these people cheering for the cops who played a role in this – forcing people from their homes at gunpoint, calling for a lockdown of the city and requesting that everyone remain in their homes, driving military style vehicles through the city streets.  They’re cheering?  I can’t help but think about what we would typically expect to see from a Banana Republic, a 3rd world country where the people were too ignorant to understand the oppression.  That is the United States now and it makes me sick and it makes me sad.

They were cheering because they caught the guy!  How exactly did they do it?  Did all the military power and door to door illegal searches achieve this?  No.  A citizen reported seeing the suspect in his boat. (If you even believe the concocted story … I don’t).  So what exactly were they cheering about?  Oh!  Was it because they caught the bomber maybe?  But what is the evidence against him?  What are people thinking?!  We are already convicting this person.  Why?  Simply because the FBI posted a fuzzy photo of him at the marathon?  Please, people.  Don’t be manipulated.  If they do have evidence, we haven’t seen it.  It is difficult for me to write about this because I’m discussing the reaction and response of people to a completely fabricated psyop, yet I feel I must.

Much like the Lanzas and the fake 9/11 terrorists, I don’t believe these brothers even exist.  If we’re to believe they exist then we have to believe the incredibly ridiculous, impossible to even consider story we’ve been fed.  The two men who just bombed the marathon do not go into hiding.  Instead they shoot and kill a police officer.  Why?  Do you know the reason given for this murder?  Officials claim it is because they were short a gun, they needed an additional gun so they killed him so they could steal the officer’s gun but it didn’t work as the holster was locked.  Seriously?!

“The original question is they walked up to that car and appeared they shot the officer in the head unprovoked, that it was an assassination. But why? How did that fit into their plan? The operating theory now in the investigation is they were short one gun. The older brother had a gun. They wanted to get a gun for the younger brother and the fastest and most efficient way they could think of doing it was a surprise attack on a cop, to take his weapon and go. Officer Collier had a locking holster, it’s like a three-way lock. If you don’t know how to remove the gun, you’re not going to get it out. There was apparently an attempt to yank it and they couldn’t get it and left. “  (link)

So they had only one gun, some pipe bombs and a crock pot, or was it a pressure cooker bomb?  They stole a Mercedes SUV, the driver reported it, they had the shoot-out with police in which a witness allegedly saw the pressure cooker (convenient), Tamerlan was either run over by his brother or shot by police (depending on the version you choose to believe), Dzhokhar got away and was found in a boat in Watertown the next day.  The homeowner called police because he lifted up the flap and saw a person in his boat.  Yet police had to show off their high tech infrared equipment to the world, we all had to see the images even though they already knew he (or someone) was inside the boat.

There was allegedly another shootout with police.  There are videos of the sound of gunfire from a neighboring window and there are photos of the boat riddled with bullet holes.  But there’s a problem because according to this article, Dzhokhar was unarmed.

When police arrived, the official said they were able to make contact with the suspect in the boat, while a helicopter equipped with infra-red technology detected movement inside the boat.

The official did not know what the suspect told the officers, but there was discussion about whether the suspect was armed.

When he was taken into custody, the official said, Tsarnaev was not armed and no explosives were found in his possession.

So he was unarmed?  Then how did they exchange gunshots?   Again, I’m commenting on a fabricated story so it feels odd to point out inconsistencies.  I believe that is why there are so many inconsistencies with this and with Sandy Hook.  When something really happens, the truth is there and it’s simply reported.  It has weight to it and facts to support the story.  It is difficult to hold up a fake story and we will always see these kinds of inconsistencies that make the whole thing completely impossible to believe.

The latest – according to officials, Tsarnaev told them that they’d planned to drive to NYC to bomb Times Square.  They still had an extra pressure cooker bomb and apparently they didn’t want it to go to waste.  Oh, and the bombs at the marathon were set off with toy remote controls.

What will be the outcome of this?  It’s difficult to grasp the full agenda here but we can most definitely count on more police state, probably TSA everywhere, searches everywhere we go, constant surveillance and warrantless searches.

Why am I so convinced the whole thing is fake?  The photos are altered (photo-shopped), all of the video from that day is CGI (Look at it closely and compare it to video that you trust), and the story is ridiculous. I believe that just like Sandy Hook, nothing we saw from that day was live.  I’ll be covering some of the video and photo anomalies soon.  Before I do, I just needed to get my thoughts out there about all of this and how sad I am for how our country once was.

“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
Ben Franklin

Another finish line comparison

The image on the left shows the winners at the finish line.  Notice how different the background looks compared to the one on the right, which is a screen shot from video *just* before the “bomb”.  If you click on it, you can see it much larger. There is a visible TV screen on the side of the red building which is not visible in the one on the right.

I took the screen shot from this video: